Kenya Targets Crypto Licence Speculation With Three-Year Transfer Restriction

Imagine a company applying for one of Kenya’s first cryptocurrency licences, not because it plans to build an exchange, wallet or stablecoin business, but because it expects the permit to become valuable.
The company secures the licence, does little or no business, then looks for a foreign crypto platform willing to buy the company or pay a premium for the regulatory approval.
Kenya is attempting to prevent that kind of permit speculation.
Under the Virtual Asset Service Providers Regulations, 2026, a licensed crypto business must begin operating and hold its licence for at least 36 months from the start of operations before an application to transfer or assign that licence can be considered.
The restriction is intended to ensure that Kenya’s crypto licences go to genuine operators rather than applicants hoping to obtain regulatory approval and resell it later for profit.
Kenya Restricts the Transfer of Crypto Licences
Regulation 11 requires a Virtual Asset Service Provider, or VASP, seeking to assign or transfer its licence to submit an application to the appropriate regulator and pay the prescribed fee.
Any transfer completed without regulatory approval is considered invalid and may provide grounds for the licence to be revoked.
More importantly, the regulator may only consider a transfer application where the licensee has:
- Commenced business in accordance with the conditions of the licence
- Held the licence for at least 36 months from the date it began operations
- Fully complied with the VASP Regulations
This means receiving a crypto licence does not give a company an unrestricted asset that it can immediately sell or pass to another operator.
The licensee must first demonstrate that it is a functioning and compliant virtual asset business.
The Three-Year Period Starts When Business Begins
An important detail is that the 36-month period runs from the date the licensed business commences operations, not merely from the date the permit is issued.
The regulations state that a licensee should commence its virtual asset business immediately after receiving approval. Where immediate commencement is impractical, the company may seek an extension, but that extension cannot exceed 12 months from the date the licence was granted.
A company therefore cannot simply obtain a licence, leave it unused for three years and then request permission to transfer it.
It must start operating in line with the licence conditions before the three-year holding period can effectively run.
What Is Crypto Licence Speculation?
Crypto licence speculation happens when a person or company applies for regulatory approval primarily because the permit itself may become more valuable.
This is more likely in a new or tightly controlled market where:
- Only a limited number of licences may be issued
- The approval process is expensive or complicated
- International companies want faster access to the local market
- Regulatory licences are difficult to obtain
- Early licence holders gain a significant commercial advantage
Instead of building a compliant crypto business, a speculative applicant may plan to sell the licensed company, transfer the permit or attract a larger operator willing to pay for ready-made market access.
Business Daily reported that the transfer restriction is aimed at ensuring licences are granted to operators with long-term business plans rather than investors seeking to flip regulatory approvals.
This Is Not a Three-Year Licence Expiry Rule
The three-year restriction should not be confused with the duration or renewal period of a crypto licence.
The rule does not state that a Kenyan VASP licence automatically expires after three years.
Instead, it establishes the minimum period a licensed operator must conduct business before its application to transfer or assign the licence can be considered.
Even after the 36 months have passed, the transfer is not automatic. The company must still apply to the relevant regulator, pay the applicable fee and obtain approval.
The regulations list the approval fee for assigning or transferring a licence as 0.25 percent of the transaction value.
Why Kenya Is Tightening the Licensing Process
Kenya’s crypto licensing framework is built under the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025, which created the legal foundation for licensing and regulating businesses offering virtual asset services in the country.
The detailed VASP Regulations were introduced to operationalise that Act and create rules covering licensing, governance, consumer protection, cybersecurity, capital requirements, anti-money-laundering controls and market conduct. The government’s regulatory impact assessment says the framework is intended to create a safer, more transparent and innovative virtual asset sector.
The regulations have since been published as Legal Notice 134 of 2026 under the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act.
The transfer restriction fits within that wider objective by discouraging applicants who do not have the staff, technology, capital or long-term commitment required to operate responsibly.
Which Crypto Businesses Are Covered?
The framework applies to businesses offering virtual asset services in or from Kenya.
A company can also be considered to be operating in Kenya when it earns income or economic benefit from the country, even where it does not have a physical office locally.
The regulated activities include services such as:
- Cryptocurrency exchanges
- Virtual asset brokers
- Crypto wallet providers
- Virtual asset payment processors
- Stablecoin issuers
- Virtual asset investment advisers
- Virtual asset managers
- Tokenisation and token issuance platforms
Under the regulatory structure, the Central Bank of Kenya is responsible for areas including virtual asset wallets, payment processing and stablecoin issuance. The Capital Markets Authority supervises activities including exchanges, brokers, investment advisers, asset managers, initial coin offerings and tokenisation platforms.
This means the three-year transfer restriction may affect both local companies and international crypto businesses seeking to establish or acquire a licensed operation in Kenya.
Could the Rule Affect Mergers and Acquisitions?
The restriction could make it more difficult for a new licensee to sell its regulated business during its first three years.
For example, a startup may receive a licence, commence operations and later face financial difficulties. A larger exchange may then offer to acquire the company.
The three-year rule means the licence cannot simply be assigned to the buyer before the required period has passed.
However, the regulations distinguish between transferring a licence and changes involving shares, ownership or control. Crypto firms considering acquisitions, restructurings or new investors will need to examine whether the transaction requires approval as a licence transfer, a change in control or both.
The framework also requires applicants to report intended changes in ownership or control where those changes are material to the business.
This could make regulatory planning an important part of future crypto mergers and acquisitions in Kenya.
What the Rule Means for Foreign Crypto Companies
International exchanges and other crypto platforms may have considered purchasing a locally licensed business as the fastest route into Kenya.
The transfer restriction reduces the attractiveness of obtaining a licence solely for resale to a foreign operator.
However, it does not necessarily prevent international companies from entering Kenya through investment, partnership or acquisition. Such arrangements would still have to comply with ownership, control, licensing and regulatory approval requirements.
The rule could encourage foreign businesses to apply directly, establish long-term local operations or work with Kenyan companies that already have a genuine operational history.
It could also increase the value of established, compliant businesses that have operated beyond the three-year restriction and maintained good standing with regulators.
Potential Benefits of the Three-Year Restriction
The measure may produce several benefits for Kenya’s developing crypto sector.
It discourages licence flipping
Applicants must show that they intend to operate, rather than simply obtain a permit and wait for a buyer.
It supports regulatory due diligence
The three-year period gives regulators time to observe how a company manages customer funds, cybersecurity, reporting, governance and compliance.
It protects consumers during ownership changes
An abrupt transfer of a crypto licence could affect customer assets, service continuity and accountability. Regulatory approval gives the authorities an opportunity to evaluate the proposed new operator.
It encourages long-term investment
Companies may need to build local teams, compliance systems, customer support and technological infrastructure instead of treating the licence as a short-term financial asset.
It may strengthen confidence in licensed firms
A licence becomes evidence that a company has met regulatory requirements and operated under supervision, rather than merely completing an application.
Possible Concerns for Startups
Although the rule may curb speculation, it could also create challenges.
A genuine startup may need to sell or restructure before completing three years because of funding difficulties, changes in strategy or consolidation within the industry.
Crypto businesses operate in a volatile market, and three years can be a long time for an early-stage company.
The restriction could therefore make investors more cautious about funding a regulated startup if they believe their exit options will be limited.
It may also favour larger companies that can afford the licensing, staffing, technology and compliance costs required to sustain operations for several years.
The practical effect will depend on how the Central Bank of Kenya and Capital Markets Authority interpret transfers, acquisitions and changes of control.
The Wider Requirements for Kenyan Crypto Firms
The transfer restriction is only one part of a much broader licensing regime.
Applicants are required to provide detailed information about directors, senior officers, significant shareholders and beneficial owners. They must also submit business plans, proof of funding, risk-management systems, AML controls, cybersecurity policies and evidence of sufficient human and technological resources.
The rules also require audited financial statements covering the preceding three years or verified opening financial statements for newly incorporated businesses.
These obligations indicate that Kenya is treating crypto licences more like regulated financial-services approvals than ordinary business permits.
Receiving a licence will require more than registering a company and launching a website.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Kenya’s three-year crypto licence rule?
A licensed Virtual Asset Service Provider must operate and hold its licence for at least 36 months from the commencement of business before an application to transfer or assign the licence can be considered.
Does the licence automatically become transferable after three years?
No. The operator must still apply to the relevant regulator, pay the prescribed fee and obtain approval.
Can a company hold the licence without operating for three years?
No. The regulations require the business to commence operations. The three-year period is calculated from the date the company begins operating.
How long does a crypto company have to start operating?
A company is expected to begin immediately after receiving its licence. Where that is impractical, it may request an extension of up to 12 months.
Does the three-year rule mean the licence expires after three years?
No. It is a minimum holding period for considering a transfer or assignment, not an automatic expiry date.
Which regulators supervise crypto companies in Kenya?
The Central Bank of Kenya and Capital Markets Authority supervise different categories of Virtual Asset Service Providers under the VASP framework.
Can a foreign company purchase a licensed Kenyan crypto business?
A foreign company may be able to invest in or acquire a Kenyan business, but the transaction would have to comply with the rules governing licence transfers, ownership and changes in control.
Conclusion
Kenya’s three-year restriction is designed to stop individuals and companies from acquiring crypto licences merely to resell them.
Licensed businesses must commence operations, comply with their regulatory obligations and hold the licence for at least 36 months before a transfer application can be considered.
The rule could strengthen the credibility of Kenya’s crypto sector by ensuring that licences are granted to genuine, long-term operators.
At the same time, regulators will need to apply the restriction carefully so that it does not block legitimate investment, restructuring or acquisitions involving compliant companies.
For crypto businesses considering Kenya, the message is straightforward: securing a licence is no longer the final goal. It is the beginning of a long-term regulatory commitment.




